My Platform

Aug. 7th, 2003 02:40 pm
tugrik: (Default)
[personal profile] tugrik
Since an amazing number of friends have emailed, IM'd or chatted with me on the mu* about my run for governor (heh, right), I figure I should state what my goals would be were I elected. :)

My first one would be a double-punch: Try to fix some of the unemployment woes while at the same time reducing our percentage of oil-dependancy. I'd start up some huuuge public-works projects, like the nation has done in our depressed-econcomy past. Instead of bridges or dams or whatnot, I'd be putting unemployed Californians to work building alternative energy systems: solar convection towers, ocean thermocline generators, additional windfarms and the installation of solar roof-panelling on all public and government buildings. There's a lot of research out there that shows that alternative energy systems can be efficient and profitable once done at a large enough scale. For example, the cost of thin-film solar would come down immensely if a customer as big as the State of California were to buy enough to ramp up manufacturing. We're in a unique position to do that.

Next, I'd change some of the tax code for vehicles. The licensing, registration, environmental-impact and other fees would scale quickly with the size, weight, and inefficiency of the vehicle. You want to drive your Hummer H2 in stop-and-go traffic, getting 6mpg and blowing fumes, go right ahead! Just be prepared to pay an even healthier share when the fees come due, to help offset the problems your consumption is causing. With luck this will help sell more efficient modes of transportation (smaller cars, hybrid cars, motorcycles, decent forms of public transit, etc). The flipside of this is that I'd be even nicer to the folks who already drive hybrids, compacts, motorcycles and pedalbikes. A little carrot on one side, stick on the other, with the bulk of most midsized, decent-efficiency cars right in the middle getting normal treatment.

A more nebulous one is that I'd try to get the government out of the religion business. Marriage is a civil contract that should be binding between the two people who want it, not just between 'two genders under the eyes of god'. Religious groups wouldn't get state sponsorship simply for being a religion. There's a bunch of these types of shouldn't-happen mixes going on; too much of our goverment is tied up subtly enforcing particular religous beliefs. Leave that to the churches, not the government.

There's more, but this is a good start for something flytyped while noshing chinese food at the work-desk. :) Free potstickers for everyone! *passes out goodies*
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

tugrik: (Default)
tugrik

March 2010

S M T W T F S
 1234 56
78 910 111213
1415 16 17 181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 04:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios